What to see

Above you'll notice a ring of large blueish disks and a ring of small blueish disks. They slowly rotate, but that's only by the way.

In their centers are are 2 orange disks. Thry to judge whether these 2 are of equal size. They will probably not look equal – at least they don't look equal to me, the right one (the one surrounded by the small disks) looks larger to me.

What to do

Use the slider to enlarge one orange disk it relative to the other one until you're satisfied. Then, do either of 3 things:

Obviously, the context – here the surrounding smaller or larger disks –  affects our size judgement.

Comments

This illusion is named after Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneer in memory research, who likely discovered this illusion in the 1890s, but did not publish it in any specific publication. Rather, Titchener (whithout claiming authorship) published it in a 1901 textbook; thus it is also frequently called the Titchener illusion.

The mechanisms causing this illusion are not well understood; probably it is closely related to the Delboef Illusion. It is one of the minority of illusions where a sizable age effect has been found (Doherty et al. 2010): For children under age 10 the illusion is weaker.

There was a strong suggestion that the illusion does not affect grasping, only vision (Aglioti et al. 1995), which led the the “two visual systems” hypothesis (Goodale & Milner). After considerable debate and multiple reproduction attempts of several groups, I now see a consensus that there is no difference in the effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping and perception (Kopiske et al., 2016).

Sources

Wikipedia: Ebbinghaus Illusion

Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 5:679–685

Doherty MJ, Campbell NM, Tsuji H, Phillips WA(2010) The Ebbinghaus illusion deceives adults but not young children. Developmental Science 13: 714–721

Kopiske KK, Bruno N, Hesse C, Schenk T, Franz VH (2016) Do visual illusions affect grasping? Considerable progress in a scientific debate. A Reply to Whitwell & Goodale, 2016. Cortex

 

Created: 2013-12-23


   |   Impressum·Legal notice   |  
Last update 2016-11-01 by Michael Bach (G+)